Manufacturer operating requirements define the rollout scope

Every manufacturer environment is different

Modern eCoC processes can vary significantly depending on vehicle categories, production volumes, homologation structures, IVI 2.0 preparation status, integration requirements and operational complexity.

As a result, implementation planning is based on operational scope rather than predefined package structures.

Factors that influence implementation planning

• Vehicle Categories Different vehicle classes can require different preparation paths, approval context and release checks.
• Production Volume Expected annual activity helps shape onboarding, operating rhythm and support expectations.
• IVI 2.0 Readiness Readiness depends on available vehicle information, review maturity and XML-related preparation.
• Approval & Homologation Complexity Complex approval structures may need clearer reference visibility and team coordination.
• Validation Workflows Review depth and exception handling influence how preparation activities are structured.
• eIDAS Signing Workflows Signing-readiness responsibilities affect the release path and operational ownership model.
• EUCARIS / NAP Preparation Delivery-related readiness can influence rollout sequencing and release preparation.
• ERP & API Integration Connected environments may change implementation sequencing, data ownership and testing needs.
• Multi-stage Vehicle Workflows Staged vehicle environments can introduce additional approval and completion responsibilities.
• VECTO Data Reuse Existing VECTO information can reduce repeated entry when import mapping is part of scope.

Organizations can begin with a focused operational scope

Digital CoC implementations do not require every process to be deployed immediately.

Manufacturers can begin with selected vehicle categories, preparation processes or certificate workspaces and expand gradually.

This reduces onboarding complexity and supports controlled operational adoption.

After your request, we review the vehicle scope and source systems, discuss a focused product walkthrough, then outline a pilot and written implementation scope. No fixed package or price is implied.

Typical operational starting points

These examples describe common starting contexts. They are not packages, plans or fixed offers.

• Small Series Manufacturer Start with a focused vehicle category and a practical preparation process for smaller teams.
• Multi-stage Vehicle Operations Structure preparation visibility across staged, completed or body-built vehicle environments.
• Approval-Focused Teams Improve coordination around approval references, homologation context and release preparation.
• IVI 2.0 Preparation Projects Organize vehicle information and review activities before XML-related processes begin.
• VECTO-Based Workflows Reuse existing VECTO information where mapping can reduce repeated operational entry.
• ERP-Connected Environments Plan integration scope around data ownership, API coordination and certificate readiness.

Tell us about your certificate workspace

Share the essentials so we can understand your vehicle scope, process priorities and implementation context before the first discussion.

Frequently asked questions

• Why are there no public package prices? Implementation requirements vary significantly depending on operational scope and manufacturer processes.
• Can organizations begin with a limited scope? Yes. Implementations can begin with selected processes and expand gradually.
• Do all projects require integrations? No. Integration scope depends on operational requirements.
• Does Digital CoC support IVI 2.0 processes? Yes. The platform is structured around IVI 2.0-ready certificate processes.